Firewall/NAT

Greetz 2 all. I have a problem with port forwarding in m0n0wall 1.231. I'm so tired of solving.. so, any help would be greatly appreciated!

I have 2 interfaces:

1) WAN, PPPoE with real IP adress
2) LAN, 192.168.1.0 D-class net

I have a 192.168.1.122 server with Radmin (remote administrator proggie - like VNC and so on) on 28028 port. I need it to be acessed within WAN real IP adress from Internet by connecting to 28028 to the real-ip WAN adress.

So, what I've done:

First of all, I map external 28028 port to 28028 port into the LAN segment:

(http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/7615/m0n0wallpic01lw5.gif)

Second, I permit all from any to 1.122...

(http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/9982/m0n0wallpic02ky4.gif)


BUT.. It didn't work! And I wonder why... Could anybody tell me what's wrong? Thanks in advance...

PS. I've also tried to permit 1.122 packets in any direction onto the LAN page:

(http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5852/m0n0wallpic03wh2.gif)

but it didn't works also

I am also having this same problem... Different IPs and subnets of course but i've done this before with NAT and port forwarding on other devices but for some reason i just can't get monowall to work am i missing something, ive tried all the same setups as the previous post?  I can get my pptp to work And sometimes i just use the vpn to get to my computer but i still would like to get this going.  I am using version 1.3b10 any suggestions?

Your Firewall Rule is wrong. You have Destination Port = * Don't use *, use the same port number you have as Int. Port Range in Firewall : NAT : Inbound, namely 28028.

Ok, I've tried different configurations BUT nothing happens First of all, I wrote 28028 everywhere I can.

(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8486/m0n00202tg5.gif)

I've applied the settings.. But.. Nothing.

Then I went to the Firewall States and get diagnostics there:

(http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/4195/m0n00201ge0.gif)

as you can see, my system (.110) is trying to connect to m0n0wall at .112 on 28028 and fails.. BTW my .110 system is using m0n0wall also - but via outbound NAT so it couldnt be a problem, am I right?

Well also I saw 9xxx ports coming from my .110 system to 28028 and tried to open theese ports like this:

(http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8755/m0n00203uq6.gif)

but nothing happens.. still no connection :-/

BTW I set the "log packets for this rule" switch ON onto this rule.. but in LOGS I cant find anything declined by this rule (as permitted too..). I'm seriously confused.... Any ideas??

What version of monowall are you using, im using 1.3b10 it does say its a beta version however i am forced to use this version due to the ports on the board im running it on.  I am looking in the forums and an awful lot of people are having this same issue, i wonder if it is a bug the developers missed or maybe they are working on it?

I'm using 1.231 version.. As for bugfix there are no any port forwarding bug fixes or so on in whatsnew... The question still open

finally the problem is solved  by adding routes to the WAN segment of the net into the LAN computer. 

Im not sure exactly what you are trying to say, you added routes to the wan segment? how did you accomplish this