News: This forum is now permanently frozen.
Pages: [1]
Topic: watchdog timeout - resetting (Intel LAN adapters!) - SOLVED  (Read 4345 times)
« on: September 07, 2007, 16:07:19 »
sourcefinder *
Posts: 11

I use the 1.3b4-version of m0n0wall. Because I had a lot of errors 'watchdog timeout' I switched from realtek LAN cards to original Intel cards. That was a lot better. But...

When I use P2P (Bearshare, Limewire) on one of my computers, this error watchdog timeout - resetting keeps coming, first on the WAN-adapter, then on the LAN-adapter. As soon as I disable the P2P software and reset the M0n0wall, everything runs perfect. The machine I am running M0n0wall on is an Intel Pentium 1000 with a VIA-chipset. I checked the BIOS: plug & play OS is disabled. Has anyone got simular problems? The only thing I read was that this error was due to bad Realtek adapters!Wat is Watchdog anyway? something I can turn off..?

In advance thanks for the help!
« Last Edit: September 24, 2007, 20:59:57 by sourcefinder »
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2007, 08:48:22 »
cmb *****
Posts: 851

which Intel adapters? fxp, em, or dc?

This is common with dc cards. The dc(4) man page says:

     watchdog timeout  A packet was queued for transmission and a trans-
     mit command was issued, but the device failed to acknowledge the trans-
     mission before a timeout expired.  This can happen if the device is
     unable to deliver interrupts for some reason, of if there is a problem
     with the network connection (cable or network equipment) that results in
     a loss of link.

In addition to that, the dc(4) driver seems to be buggy and suffer this for no apparent reason with some cards.

But if it's a fxp or em card, that's a much different story. Should never see that with either of those.
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2007, 16:44:19 »
sourcefinder *
Posts: 11

I can't find the types that you named, but they are Intel Pro/1000 GT cards (new ones). This is the link to this product:
http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro1000gt_desktop_adapter.htm

Since the internet connection is always stable when I bypass the M0n0wall, I can't imagine there's a problem with cables and the switchbox.

When I read your comment, the most likely possibility is that the mainboard with VIA 694 is the 'bad link'; this chipset isn't as stable as, let's say, an Intel mainboard. Since the M0n0wall is more stable with the Intel cards, but not perfect yet, this could very well be a reason.

Can I adjust the timeout-time somehow? When this doesn't help, I think I'll try another PC (I've got several).


« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2007, 01:52:21 »
cmb *****
Posts: 851

em cards can also experience this, but this is the first I've heard of it happening.

It's likely an interrupt problem the motherboard is somehow causing. A BIOS update or change in BIOS settings may resolve it.
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2007, 16:27:06 »
sourcefinder *
Posts: 11

Ok. I have updated the BIOS this morning; so far everything is running stable. I'll keep you informed!
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2007, 21:01:41 »
sourcefinder *
Posts: 11

Running stable for 12 days now. Bad BIOS was the problem!
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2007, 15:03:04 »
bitonw **
Posts: 79

i think that your new bios sorted a IRQ problem  Cheesy
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2007, 20:13:28 »
sourcefinder *
Posts: 11

Probably true. However: I'm convinced that using good hardware, like the embedded systems or an Intel-chipset (and probably Intel-based LAN cards) are the right answer to a lot of problems. And of course the newest BIOS version. I can recommend that to all beginning M0n0wall users!
 
Pages: [1]
 
 
Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines